The Mark of the Wolfman AKA La marca del Hombre Lobo (1968)
(Note IMDb has release date as 29th July 1968, not 1967)
---
Subkultur Entertainment Blu-ray + DVD:
---
This is part 4 of a series:
Paul Naschy - Legacy of a Wolfman #4
(of which Werewolf Shadow is #3)
---
Note that, unlike the other two Subkultur Paul Naschy releases for which I provided corrections/improvements, in which both discs were region free, the discs in this release are definitely region locked (region B / region 2).
---
Blu-ray:
Title: The Mark of the Wolfman
Country: Germany
Region: B (locked)
Releasing Studio: Subkultur Entertainment
Case Type: Keep Case
Aspect Ratio: 2.20:1
Codec: AVC MPEG-4
Picture: 1080p 24fps
Soundtracks:
Spanish DTS-HD Master Audio 1.0
German DTS-HD Master Audio 1.0
Subtitles: English, German
Cuts: no known cuts - presumably uncut, original Spanish version (94:33)
Commentaries: none
Extras:
German Theatrical Trailer (original) (2:14)
German Theatrical Trailer (re-release) (2:44)
US Theatrical Trailer (2:12)
US TV Spot (0:49)
International Opening and Closing Credits (4:18)
Stills Gallery (53 images) (4:20)
Notes:
Extras are in 1080p.
Case title: Die Vampire des Dr. Dracula.
Includes a 32 page booklet by David Renske (in German).
Comes with an O-card slipcover.
(Note it is also apparently a Limited Edition, but I haven't been able to determine how many copies.)
Easter Eggs: none known
Amazon ASIN: B00QRLUM86
Source: I own it
---
DVD:
Title: The Mark of the Wolfman
Country: Germany
Region: 2
Releasing Studio: Subkultur Entertainment
Case Type: Keep Case
Aspect Ratio: 2.20:1
Anamorphic?: Yes
PAL or NTSC?: PAL
Soundtracks:
Spanish Dolby Digital 1.0
German Dolby Digital 1.0
Subtitles: English, German
Cuts: no known cuts - presumably uncut, original Spanish version (90:39 PAL) (equivalent to 94:26)
Commentaries: none
Extras:
German Theatrical Trailer (original) (2:07)
German Theatrical Trailer (re-release) (2:35)
US Theatrical Trailer (2:05)
US TV Spot (0:45)
International Opening and Closing Credits (4:06)
Stills Gallery (53 images) (4:25)
Notes:
Case title: Die Vampire des Dr. Dracula.
Includes a 32 page booklet by David Renske (in German).
Comes with an O-card slipcover.
(Note it is also apparently a Limited Edition, but I haven't been able to determine how many copies.)
Easter Eggs: none known
Amazon ASIN: B00QRLUM86
Source: I own it
The Mark of the Wolfman (1968) ADDED
Moderator: Forum Team
-
- Rewind Moderator
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006 10:08
- Location: california
- Contact:
Re: The Mark of the Wolfman (1968)
I’ll take this one
-
- Rewind Moderator
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006 10:08
- Location: california
- Contact:
Re: The Mark of the Wolfman (1968)
Does anyone know the source of the Spanish master used on the German Blu-ray and the French and Spanish DVDs? At the 65mm aspect ratio of 2.20:1 it reveals more information on the top and bottom than the 2.35:1 35mm prints, but is also crops the sides and loses information that one would expect of the reverse (anamorphic 35mm blown up to 70mm).
-
- Rewind Moderator
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006 10:08
- Location: california
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: 08 Jun 2014 10:45
Re: The Mark of the Wolfman (1968) ADDED
Thanks Eric.
The only slight issue I can see is that the DVD page has "AKA Mark of the Werewolf" whereas the Blu-ray page has "AKA Mark of the Wolfman".
By the way, I also own the Shriek Show DVD. I compared a few shots, and yes you are right that the 2.35:1 Shriek Show DVD has substantially less picture vertically, but slightly more horizontally, than the 2.20:1 Subkultur Blu-ray. Given that the movie was shot on 65mm negative with a 2.20:1 format, it would make sense that if 35mm prints were made with an anamorphic 2.35:1 ratio, they would lose image top and bottom. However, I would agree with you that it seems strange that they would have more image at the sides. I would have thought that the 70mm prints would include pretty much all of the available horizontal width of the image, but I admit I don't know all that much about 65mm and 70mm film formats.
The only thing I can think of is that the final 2.20:1 image, whether as a film print or a digital scan taken from the negative, might have to be cropped slightly on all 4 sides so as not to include the rounded corners of the camera gate, whereas a 2.35:1 cropping might remove the rounded corners while still maintaining the full width.
The horizontal difference between the Blu-ray and DVD is quite small, whereas the vertical difference is more significant.
The only slight issue I can see is that the DVD page has "AKA Mark of the Werewolf" whereas the Blu-ray page has "AKA Mark of the Wolfman".
By the way, I also own the Shriek Show DVD. I compared a few shots, and yes you are right that the 2.35:1 Shriek Show DVD has substantially less picture vertically, but slightly more horizontally, than the 2.20:1 Subkultur Blu-ray. Given that the movie was shot on 65mm negative with a 2.20:1 format, it would make sense that if 35mm prints were made with an anamorphic 2.35:1 ratio, they would lose image top and bottom. However, I would agree with you that it seems strange that they would have more image at the sides. I would have thought that the 70mm prints would include pretty much all of the available horizontal width of the image, but I admit I don't know all that much about 65mm and 70mm film formats.
The only thing I can think of is that the final 2.20:1 image, whether as a film print or a digital scan taken from the negative, might have to be cropped slightly on all 4 sides so as not to include the rounded corners of the camera gate, whereas a 2.35:1 cropping might remove the rounded corners while still maintaining the full width.
The horizontal difference between the Blu-ray and DVD is quite small, whereas the vertical difference is more significant.
Last edited by Darrel_Griffin on 21 Jul 2020 16:35, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rewind Moderator
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006 10:08
- Location: california
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: 08 Jun 2014 10:45
Re: The Mark of the Wolfman (1968) ADDED
Thanks - by the way I edited my previous post, and re-posted it just after you replied, so you might not have seen everything I wrote. I'd be interested in your thoughts on the matter.