An amendment to both comparisons' footnotes, as suggested by me, is needed.
The line "2016 Swedish Film Institute tinted digital restoration, as yet unreleased on home video" should now end at the word "restoration", as it's on Criterion's new BD.
Additionally, the DVDs' different restorations should be noted against each listing:
Criterion and Tartan: 1976 photochemical restoration
Svenska Filminstitutet: 2007 photochemical restoration
Häxan AKA Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922), Part 2 UPDATED
Moderator: Forum Team
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 12 Nov 2011 16:53
- Location: UK
- Contact:
-
- Rewind Moderator
- Posts: 18706
- Joined: 27 Jun 2014 16:30
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 12 Nov 2011 16:53
- Location: UK
- Contact: